I've been thinking about beginnings
...In writing that is.
I watched Boondock Saints again last night. The first time I'd ever seen it was just a couple days ago. What I love most, is how effortlessly they introduce the characters. There is no doubt in your mind who they are from the first moment any of them are on the screen. Even if there are questions about the characters, your first instincts are usually right. And the hooks are so deeply embedded into the viewer that there is no getting away.
Take the very beginning for instance. The McManus brothers sit in a pew in the back of a modest catholic cathedral. They are dressed in black and elaborate tattoos peek out from underneathe their clothes. Not your typical church goers. Especially contrasted amongst brightly dressed church folk. But despite this, most of the congregation seem to react to the brothers as if they belong. Except for two characters. One, a little girl on the end of the bench from them, she seems curious, as if she's waiting for them to do something, ...Which they do. The second character, the preacher speaking from the pulpit at the head of the church, and the only preacher in colored robes, finishes his sermon and begins to sit down. A second preacher stands up and thanks the first for coming all the way across town from the other side of Boston. So we now know that he is not accustomed to this parish.
Suddenly the brothers stand up, and walk to the head of the church. The entire time the regular preacher is giving a sermon, about a young girl that was killed the night before, and that dozens of bystanders watched and did nothing. You can hear anger and frustration in his voice, but all the while he barely acknowledges the two brothers walking past to the crucifix behind him. They kneel down to pray. But the newcomer notices, he starts to stand up, agog at this unusual activity and one of the other parishioners gently places a hand on him to have him sit down. The viewer is now thinking, "Huh, so this is a regular thing?" The new preacher warily sits down again and the regular preacher continues with his words. As he is finishing, the brothers make their way back out of the church to the door, and turn to listen to his final phrase, "The only thing worse than Evil... Is when good men are indifferent!" Accent on the frustration and anger in his words. The brothers walk out, more tattoos are revealed, they light up their cigarettes and go on their merry way.
The whole scene takes about a minute. But it so deftly establishes the characters as potential "Angels of Death" and makes them believable, that you never doubt it for the rest of the movie. There's dozens more characters, that are introduced just as well. From the bartender at the Brothers favorite bar, with his stuttering/turret persona, made even funnier by his thick Boston accent and his misunderstanding/misuse of colloquialism, "Make like a tree and FUCK OFF!" To the Italian Mob-boss, quietly sitting with a phone to his ear while two other characters berate each other. Then after nearly 2 minutes of sitting motionless and expressionless he suddenly stands up and is screaming cuss words into the phone and turning red-faced. Suddenly his is a very imposing character. Excellent stuff.
I do have a few problems with the movie, despite it now being one of my favorites. I think it really falls apart at the end. Willem Dafoes character gets a little too wierd. And most of the scenes with Billy Connelly at the end, they're cute scenes, but it kinda loses it's believability for me. But it's still a great movie and I can't recommend it highly enough.
Back to beginnings...
Right now I'm trying to write the opening to my pirate story. And this is the first time that I've really thought about beginnings in a while. I've always known it was crucial to hook the readers in just a couple pages, and I always thought I knew how to do it. And in a way I guess I do, I know it but I don't understand it. Yet!
In my mind, the key to introducing a character, and a story, is in the way that other characters react to them. I think about when I'm sitting around a table with a bunch of other friends at Denny's or a coffee shop or something. Suddenly someone comes in with a new friend, someone that I've never met before. Of course, there are the descriptors. Is (s)he cute/competition? Does (s)he look interesting? But most of what I learn about this character in the first few encounters is what I gather from other characters/friends. I'm sort of watching how other people treat this new character. Are they rolling their eyes, like they think (s)he's a loser? Are they mouthing jokes without him/her looking? Or.. Are they all vying for his/her attention? Everyone is trying to make eye-contact with him/her? Or are they trying to relate some little quip that renews an instant connection between these two individuals, out of a large group? Essentially... How do they react? I've heard this before in writing too, that 90% of character development and 90% of action is in "Reaction". And the formula has always seemed to work for me before.
But I'm starting to notice how I go about doing it in my writing. I've realized I have a tendency to start into a scene after the action has happened, so that you are seeing the reaction first. That way you are engaging the reader even more, because they want to figure out what happened to cause this reaction. This technique has pitfalls though, I find I have to rewrite things several times to make sure that all the necessary clues are in there for the reader to connect the dots. But it seems to be coming more naturally with practice. That's how it happened with my comic book art. When I first started I would have to use twice as many panels to tell the same story. Because I was trying to draw the before, during and after of a situation. The more I did it the more I learned that all I had to draw was the reaction. What happens the moment after the punch? And drawing the characters reacting to what was said in the same panel instead of what was said in the last panel. Tricks like that. Anyways, I'm starting to see how that happens in writing as well.
So that's my spiel. I don't know if it helped me to figure out my intro, but I think getting these thoughts out there helps me understand the process better.
--Will